Assessing Sustainability for Shared Sanitation Facilities in Peri-Urban Slum (Case Study of Ciwalengke, Indonesia)

Daffa Aviciena Wibowo (1) , Anindrya Nastiti (2) , Dwina Roosmini (3)
(1) Faculty Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung,, Indonesia,
(2) Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia,
(3) Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

Shared sanitation facilities, particularly shared toilets and bathing facilities, have been a stopgap solutions for low access to household improved sanitation in peri-urban areas. However, many of these facilities are poorly maintained and show signs of neglect. This study evaluates the sustainability of shared sanitation facilities in Ciwalengke, Bandung Regency, using two modified complementary assessment frameworks: (1) the McConville and Mihelcic (2007) sustainability assessment, which examines sustainability across the life-cycle stages of sanitation systems, and (2) the UNICEF Sustainability Checks, which assess key sustainability factors of sanitation services. The findings indicate that existing assessment frameworks require contextual adaptation to reflect local conditions, including the sedentary nature of the community, the simplicity of the sanitation assistance program, and the informal hierarchy between foremen and masons involved in construction. Overall, the sustainability performance of the shared sanitation facilities remains low, with most sustainability aspects scoring below 50% of the maximum possible score. Despite these limitations, hygiene practices among the Ciwalengke community are relatively strong: open defecation rates are lower than the national average, and more than half of residents report washing their hands after defecation. A key weakness identified is the absence of meaningful community involvement during the design stage, as community representatives were not engaged in determining facility design and functionality. To enhance the long-term sustainability of sanitation facilities in Ciwalengke, this study recommends strengthening management arrangements by integrating discussions on operation and maintenance from the initial planning and construction stages through to long-term operation.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Adzawla, W., Alhassan, H., & Jongare, A. I. (2020). Explaining the Effects of Socioeconomic and Housing Characteristics on the Choice of Toilet Facilities among Ghanaian Households. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2020, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4036045

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Housing and Environmental Health Indicators.

Davis, A., Javernick-Will, A., & Cook, S. M. (2019). Analyzing Sanitation Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for Resource-Limited Communities. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(22), 13535–13545. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03134

Directorate General of Higher Education. (2009). Peta Jalan Sanitasi Sekolah Dalam Kerangka UKS 2017. https://repositori.kemendhttps://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/6029/1/Peta-Jalan-Sanitasi-Sekolah.pdf ikdasmen.go.id/6029/1/Peta-Jalan-Sanitasi-Sekolah.pdf

Isaac, Stephen., & Michael, W. Burton. (1995). Handbook in Research and Evaluation: a collection of principles, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences. EdITS.

Jones, S. A., & Silva, C. (2009). A practical method to evaluate the sustainability of rural water and sanitation infrastructure systems in developing countries. Desalination, 248(1–3), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.094

Mara, D. (2016). Shared sanitation: to include or to exclude? Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 110(5), 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trw029

McConville, J. R., & Mihelcic, J. R. (2007). Adapting Life-Cycle Thinking Tools to Evaluate Project Sustainability in International Water and Sanitation Development Work. Environmental Engineering Science, 24(7), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2006.0225

Ministry of Health Republic Indonesia. (2023). Naskah Teknokrasi Upaya Kesehatan Lingkungan di Fasilitas Layanan Kesehatan: Rumah Sakit, Puskesmas, dan Klinik. https://www.washinhcf.org/resource/naskah-teknokrasi-upaya-kesehatan-lingkungan-di-fasilitas-layanan-kesehatan-rumah-sakit-puskesmas-dan-klinik-2023-bahasa-technocratic-manuscript-on-environmental-health-efforts-in-h/

Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKR.45.3.261

UNICEF. (2017). Sustainability checks: Guidance to design and implement sustainability monitoring in WASH. https://www.unicef.org/documents/sustainability-checks-guidance-design-and-implement-sustainability-monitoring-wash

The World Bank. (2003). Efficient, Sustainable Service for All? An OED Review of the World Bank’s Assistance to Water Supply and Sanitation.

Authors

Daffa Aviciena Wibowo
Anindrya Nastiti
anindrya@itb.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Dwina Roosmini
Wibowo, D. A., Nastiti, A., & Roosmini, D. (2024). Assessing Sustainability for Shared Sanitation Facilities in Peri-Urban Slum (Case Study of Ciwalengke, Indonesia). Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 30(2), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.tl.2024.30.2.2

Article Details

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)